| |
|
|
|
PUBLIC ARTICLES: by Michael G. Brock
|
| Michael G. Brock, MA, LLP, LMSW |
| |
About Michael G. Brock
Publications by Micheal G. Brock.html
|
| |
Michael G. Brock, MA, LLP, LMSW is a private practice Mental Health Professional in Wyandotte, MI providing counseling services,
court-ordered evaluation and therapy, and driver's license evaluations. Some areas of practice Michael has been
involved with are substance abuse assessment and treatment, driver?s license appeal hearings, child custody evaluations, and evaluation
of alleged sexual abuse.
|
|
PUBLIC ARTICLES (Free): by Michael G. Brock
|
| |
Top Ten Ways to Sabotage Your Driver License Appeal (Newly Added Article)
I once had a teacher in high school who had a standard response for students who complained about the quality of education
they were getting (and in those days the quality of public education was substantially better than it is today). He would
say that, while he couldn't speak for the quality or competence of the other teachers in the school, or, for that matter,
the nation, he had found that no matter how hard he tried it was impossible for him to prevent the interested student from
learning. I sometimes steal that line when talking to client's who complain about the quality of therapy or self-help they
are receiving or have received. I say that, no matter how hard I try, I've found it impossible to prevent the motivation
patient from getting well.
Click here to View this Article
The Michigan Alcohol Screening Test: Still an Excellent Instrument (Newly Added Article)
Determining what constitutes alcohol or drug dependence in the modern age can be a bit murky, especially since
problems tend to emerge at a much earlier stage today than when I began doing treatment in the 1970's. In those
days you could have five or six drunk driving arrests and still have a driver's license. People usually went
for treatment because they were suffering medical consequences, such as liver or heart disease, pancreatitis,
bleeding ulcers, or other such symptoms of advanced alcohol/drug addiction.
Click here to View this Article
Rules Are Rules (Newly Added Article)
Recently, when discussing a driver's license appeal case with Attorney Matt Zick, he told me that when he goes
to a DAAD hearing with a client it is his custom, at the end of the hearing, to bring out and read a copy of R 257.313,
Standards for issuance of a license. Rule 13 (1) (a) requires the petitioner to prove all of the following [listed below]
by clear and convincing evidence.
Click here to View this Article
Go Strong Or Go Home (Newly Added Article)
There are times when someone is simply not ready to attend a driver license appeal hearing, and that situation presents
a challenge for both the attorney and the evaluator. The attorney has to decide whether or not he or she wants to take
the client before a hearing officer that is almost certain to rule against them. The evaluator faces the same dilemma
with the client who is not ready to go for a hearing. Do you give them an evaluation that is certain to send them to
their doom, or advise them to wait and try again when they are better prepared? I would generally choose the later course,
but some people have their minds made up to try and can't be dissuaded. If the client is not represented by counsel and
will fare poorly, I can at least tell them they would be wise to consult an attorney.
Click here to View this Article
Driver License Restoration Is Counterintuitive
One of the more rewarding aspects of my practice is driver license restoration evaluations for people who have lost their
license though drinking and driving and are appealing to the DAAD to get it back. As attorneys all know, the process is a
difficult one, and requires the ability of the client to demonstrate clear and convincing evidence that he or she has been
sober/abstinent at least a year and has high probability of remaining so. They don't all have to be committed members of
AA to achieve this; sometimes it is sufficient to show that there has been a substantial change in lifestyle sufficient to
escape the gravitational…
Click here to View this Article
False Allegations of Sexual Abuse: What Can Be Done
Over the past few years I have published several articles about the prevalence of false allegations of sexual abuse in child custody
cases. The purpose of these articles has been to heighten the awareness of mental health professions, lawyers, the judiciary and the
general public regarding these allegations, and to cite the research regarding how to differentiate true from false allegations of
abuse. During this time, however, very little has changed; the same allegations are made in the same way, with more or less the same
results. The typical scenario…
Click here to View this Article
Therapy Court
Somewhere in America, today, somewhere in Michigan, or most likely, in several places in Michigan, court is in session. The presiding judge
is not really a judge and has no legal training. He is not even a lawyer, nor has he made any effort to study the applicable …
Click here to View this Article
Current Standards for Driver License Renewal Evaluations.
The New SUBSTANCE ABUSE EVALUATION (ALCOHOL AND DRUGS) AND REQUEST FOR HEARING requests far more information than previously sought by
evaluators handling these cases. It also affords hearing officers the authority to reach conclusions about clients they have not done
sufficient evaluation to assess, such as mental health diagnosis and its impact on sobriety. Moreover, they may not be qualified to
offer an opinion on the subject if they had. Since the opinions issued by these officers do not contain their credentials, or even their
first names, it is hard to know what they are qualified to determine. However, in addition to the information traditionally asked for in
substance abuse evaluations, the DAAD is currently requiring...
Click here to View this Article
Hypothetical Questions For Cross Examining Forensic Interviewers
Recently I was asked by an attorney in another state to provide some potential questions for cross-examining mental health experts in
a sex abuse allegation case. The persons being interviewed were the treating therapist, whose recommendation was based solely on the
mother's allegation of abuse, and someone who had been hired to do an “extended” post-forensic interview. Both of these tactics are still
commonly employed by prosecutors or others involved in the forensic interviewing process when they are not happy with the evidence obtained
through legitimate means. The fact that this process of incorporating sexist and intentionally biased evidence into legitimate legal process
is still routine should give anyone genuinely concerned about achieving due process for men accused of these crimes the willies. It does me.
Of course, these represent possible questions and could be reworded or rephrased to suit the needs of the case…
Click here to View this Article
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Michael G. Brock, MA, LLP, LMSW
today at 313-802-0863, or browse the website for more information about counseling services,
drivers license restoration, or evaluations and therapy.
|
| |
|
|